Fuqua, Hinkle & Davis v. Pabst Brewing Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Third District, in an appeal from Potter County. The suit was brought by the Pabst Brewing Company against Kingsbury, and other defendants who were sureties to guaranty the performance of his contract with the company. Plaintiff recovered judgment. The sureties only appealed, and on affirmance of the judgment, obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the Court
On the 26th day of August, 1892, Pabst Brewing Company, a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of Wisconsin, doing business in the City of Milwaukee, entered into a written contract with C.P. Kingsbury, of Amarillo, Texas, whereby the former agreed to sell to the latter such beer, of the quality manufactured by said corporation, as he might purchase under the agreement during its continuance, at specified prices, which prices included the freight on the beer from Milwaukee to Amarillo as well as on the empty cooperage to be returned under the terms of the contract from Amarillo to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Edwards County v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Hays v. CageTexas Supreme Court · 1847
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. TexacoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Gates v. HooperTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Commonwealth v. StraussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.