Johnson v. Breckenridge-Stephens Title Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBlanks, J.
The defendant in error, referred to in this opinion as the abstract company; instituted this suit in the district court of- Stephens county against the plaintiffs in error, to recover the sum of $1,500, alleged to be due it on an account stated in the following allegation of the abstract company’s petition:
'“That heretofore, to wit, during the months of April and May, 1919, defendants had access to and use of the files, records, and abstract plant, which was the property of plaintiff. It was understood and agreed that so long as defendants were permitted to usé said files, records, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Farrington v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Texas Gas Utilities Company v. BarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Beaumont v. FertittaTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Morgan v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Perry v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.