Legal Opinion

Parker v. Holmes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action based on negligence to recover damages for personal injury and injury to property growing out of a collision of automobiles.

The only question is whether the amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. That pleading alleges, in its first cause of action:

“I.
“At all times material herein, Mill Street and Centennial Boulevard were paved, public streets which intersect at right angles in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon; Mill Street extending north and ■south, and Centennial Boulevard extending east and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ashland v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Speight v. SimonsenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rose v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cunningham v. Oregon Farmers InstituteOregon Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lunski v. LindemannOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API