Legal Opinion
Parker v. Holmes
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action based on negligence to recover damages for personal injury and injury to property growing out of a collision of automobiles.
The only question is whether the amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. That pleading alleges, in its first cause of action:
“I.
“At all times material herein, Mill Street and Centennial Boulevard were paved, public streets which intersect at right angles in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon; Mill Street extending north and ■south, and Centennial Boulevard extending east and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weinstein v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Ashland v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Speight v. SimonsenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Rose v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Cunningham v. Oregon Farmers InstituteOregon Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lunski v. LindemannOregon Supreme Court · 1974