Speight v. Simonsen
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff claims that while he was riding his motorcycle in an easterly direction on the south side of a street in Portland, and when he had reached a point near the center of the intersection of that street with a cross-street, the defendant came along the cross-street in his automobile and ran against the motorcycle, injuring the plaintiff in a manner stated. He says, and it is admitted, that there was an ordinance of the City of Portland in effect at the time that,
“Vehicles approaching an intersecting street shall be under control so as to permit the vehicle on the right of the vehicle…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line, etc., Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WeirSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Shimoda v. BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lindsey v. BartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Nettleton v. JAMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Ross v. Willamette Valley Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Maynard v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.