Legal Opinion
Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 9, 2017No. 2015-2076PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
The instant appeal concerns the proper classification of bauxite proppants imported by Appellee Schlumberger Technology Corporation (“Schlumberger”) in 2010. U.S. Customs & Border Protection (“Customs”) classified the subject merchandise under Subheading 6909.19.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). 1 Schlumberger appealed Customs’s classification to the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”). The CIT rejected Customs’s classification and, instead, entered summary judgment that the subject merchandise should enter un der HTSUS…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Solarworld Americas, Inc. v. United States, Yingli Green Energy Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Gerson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Chemtall, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Adc Telecommunications, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.