Legal Opinion

Cazares v. Cosby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2003No. 20010599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

¶ 1 The plaintiff, Rosalind Cazares (“Ca-zares”), appeals the trial court’s decision to conduct a hearing, pursuant to rule 104 of the Utah Rules of Evidence, to determine the admissibility of handwriting evidence offered to prove forgery of deeds to real property. She also challenges the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motion to preclude the introduction of that handwriting evidence and the trial court’s order of dismissal. Cazares challenges the trial court’s decisions as violating her rights under the Utah Constitution, article I, sections 7, 10, and 11. We affirm in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States v. Richard D. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Murray City v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Valley Colour, Inc. v. Beuchert Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fairfax Realty, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Patterson v. American Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Puttuck v. GendronCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  5. Berkshires, L.L.C. v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API