Puttuck v. Gendron
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
11 Plaintiffs Paul Puttuck and Paul Put-tuck dba Breakthrough Construction appeal from the trial court's dismissal of their claims against Defendants Peter and William Gen-dron for wrongful use of civil proceedings, abuse of process, civil perjury, obstruction of justice, and civil conspiracy. Although the trial court improperly considered evidence from another trial in its ruling, Plaintiffs' complaint fails to state any claim for which relief could be granted and was properly dismissed. Also, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to grant Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rusakiewicz v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Estrada v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Advanced Recovery Sys. v. Am. Agencies, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Timothy v. Pia, Anderson, Dorius, Reynard & Moss LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.