Legal Opinion

Tierney v. Second Ecclesiastical Society

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 19, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

We have been over with care the plaintiff’s motion to correct the finding, and find that none of the subordinate facts which are material to this controversy were found without evidence, and therefore we find the errors based upon the motion without merit.

The plaintiff’s claim of title to the two lots of land, to quiet the title to which this action was brought, rests upon a warranty deed from the Dabolls to him of date April 2d, 1877, conveying to him and his wife Mary Tierney a parcel of land described as follows: “All that one certain tract or parcel of land situate in said North Canaan…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Roberti v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  3. Taylor v. Danbury Public Hall Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartzell v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Missionary Society v. CoutuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Pepe v. AcetoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FleetwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API