Cahill v. Cahill
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Actioh to recover the possession of land, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the court, Elmer, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiffs. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPbentice, J.
Richard and Julia Cahill were husband and wife, married prior to 1877. The plaintiffs are their children and claim in the latter’s right and as her heirs at law. Julia died in 1885. In 1887 Richard married, for his second wife, the defendant Mary Cahill. Richard died in 1901, leaving surviving him his last named wife, and leaving also a will which was duly probated. The defendant McMahon is the administrator of his estate cum testamento annexo. The will gave his widow, Mary, the life nse of his estate, and the defendant McMahon the remainder in trust for certain persons and purposes. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sumner v. ChildSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818
- Tracy v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- Talcott v. GoodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1808
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. DrskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Ruick v. TwarkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Waterbury Trust Co. v. G. L. D. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.