Legal Opinion

Cranfill v. Scott & Fetzer Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 9, 1991No. S-82-181-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1979, plaintiff Jerry Cranfill was a distributor for the defendant The Scott Fetzer Company, 1 and specifically for The Kirby Company Division of The Scott Fetzer Company (“Kirby”). In her deposition testimony, Jerry Cranfill admitted that in 1979, in direct violation of her Distribution Agreement, she submitted false sales and warranty information to Kirby (Cranfill Depo., p. 52). In December 1979, pursuant to the Distributor Agreement between Kirby and plaintiffs, Kirby cancelled Jerry Cranfill’s distributorship for false reporting.

Jer…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wimer v. HolzapfelDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1994
  2. Viazis v. American Ass'n of OrthodontistsDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API