Legal Opinion
Wimer v. Holzapfel
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided September 27, 1994No. 6:93-cv-00341PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
Background
Plaintiffs, the Wimers, have brought this action alleging Defendants, Sheriff Holzapfel (Holzapfel) and Hardin County, Texas: (1) conspired to deprive them of property, liberty, free speech and free association in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; and (2) violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2). Defendants have moved for summary judgment contending that the law and facts do not create a cause of action and, in the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Med Corp., Inc. v. City of Lima and David J. Berger, Both Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lima, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Fort Bend County Wrecker Ass'n v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- O'DELL v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000