Legal Opinion

Camden Community Development Corp. v. Sutton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 1999No. 99-258PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray THORNTON, Justice.

In 1998, appellant, Camden Community Development Corporation, sought permission to rezone its property from a zoning category of RS-2 (residential) to a zoning category of M-2 (manufacturing). The City of Camden Planning Commission (the Commission) recommended appellant’s proposal to the Board of Alderman of the City of Camden (the City Board). On September 8, 1998, the proposal faded to be adopted by the City Board.

After the City Board’s failure to approve the proposed rezoning, appellant circulated an initiated petition seeking to put the issue on the November ballot.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Wenderoth v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Scroggins v. KerrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Czech v. BaerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baptist Health v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. SUMMIT MALL CO. LLC v. LemondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Fordyce Bank & Trust Co. v. Bean Timberland, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Reed v. GuardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API