Legal Opinion

Wenderoth v. City of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1971No. 5-5673; 5-5674PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellants, in these consolidated cases, appealed to the circuit court from the enactment of rezoning ordinances by the appellee city’s Board of Directors. These ordinances rezoned certain properties adjacent to appellants. Their objections are that the rezoning is contrary to the characteristics of the neighborhood and detrimental to them and to their properties. The rezoned properties are located within the city limits and are owned separately by the appellees Grand Investments, Inc. and Lawrence D. Farrar et al. Upon motions of the appellees, the circuit court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ball v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. California Co. v. State Oil & Gas BoardMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Meridian v. DavidsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Little Rock v. North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Herring v. StannusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Gorman Towers, Inc. v. BogoslavskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Night Clubs, Inc. v. City Of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. City of Lowell v. M & N Mobile Home Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Night Clubs, Inc. v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API