Legal Opinion

Fordyce Bank & Trust Co. v. Bean Timberland, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 2007No. 06-734PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This appeal requires our court to determine whether appellees Potlatch Corp. (“Potlatch”) and Idaho Timber Corp. (“Idaho”) are buyers in the ordinary course ofbusiness under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). See Ark. Code Ann. § 4-9-320 (Repl. 2001).

The appellant in this case, Fordyce Bank & Trust Co. (“Fordyce” or “the Bank”), issued several loans to appellee Bean Timberland (“Bean”) so that Bean could purchase timber from various landowners. Bean gave the Bank security interests in the purchased timber, and the proceeds from the sale of the timber were intended to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Branscumb v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Bailey v. Delta Trust & BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha MarketingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Temco Construction, LLC v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Duran v. Southwest Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Arkansas Beverage Retailers Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Johnson v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API