Legal Opinion
Rapid City v. Tuning
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1967No. 10330PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
147 N.W.2d 604 (1967)
RAPID CITY, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Everette L. TUNING, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 10330.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
January 10, 1967.
Thomas P. Ranney, Rapid City, for plaintiff and appellant.
No appearance for defendant and respondent.
HOMEYER, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was arrested and charged in the Municipal Court of Rapid City with the violation of a city ordinance which prohibited a dog from running at large. Prior to trial defendant made a motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds.[1] The motion was granted[2] and the city appeals.
SDC 45.0201 provides: "Every…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Dickinson v. ThressNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Kalmbach v. City of MobridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Pettus v. WeyelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. City of DraperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- City of Marion v. SchoenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ClarkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010