Legal Opinion
Pettus v. Weyel
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 3, 1920No. 6442. [fn*]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.
We adopt appellant’s statement of the nature and result of the suit, as follows:
“Plaintiff sued in his individual capacity and as next friend pf his minor child, alleging that defendant and defendant’s wife owned a dog that became afflicted with rabies and bit the minor plaintiff, Catherine Weyel, and that, as a result thereof, the said minor suffered in the sum of $20,000; that as a further result he in his individual capacity suffered $500.
“Defendant is charged with having violated a city ordinance in regard to letting dogs run at large, therefore guilty of negligence .per se, and is also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- Bradford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Cogdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Long v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Dakan v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- McConnell v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Villareal v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.