Legal Opinion

Pettus v. Weyel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1920No. 6442. [fn*]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

We adopt appellant’s statement of the nature and result of the suit, as follows:

“Plaintiff sued in his individual capacity and as next friend pf his minor child, alleging that defendant and defendant’s wife owned a dog that became afflicted with rabies and bit the minor plaintiff, Catherine Weyel, and that, as a result thereof, the said minor suffered in the sum of $20,000; that as a further result he in his individual capacity suffered $500.
“Defendant is charged with having violated a city ordinance in regard to letting dogs run at large, therefore guilty of negligence .per se, and is also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bradford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Cogdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Long v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dakan v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. McConnell v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Villareal v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API