Legal Opinion

Dickenson v. Kallusch

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1928No. Docket No. 5801PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

This action was commenced by Martha Kallusch, wife of Frederick W. Kallusch, to have declared null and void a deed executed by Frederick W. Kallusch to the defendants Brown, conveying certain real property belonging to said Frederick W. Kallusch. Prior to the execution of said deed Mrs. Kallusch commenced a divorce action against her husband, and obtained an order requiring the defendant husband to pay to her the sum of $115 for attorney’s fees and costs. Within two months from the commencement of said divorce action Mrs. Kallusch died. This action to set aside the deed was continued in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. MacKay v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. MaherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API