Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 16, 1992No. 91-016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, John A. Baker, appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court (Groff, J.) of driving after being certified as an habitual offender, asserting that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he knowingly violated RSA 262:23 (Supp. 1991). We affirm.

*448On October 31, 1979, the superior court certified John A. Baker, date of birth September 5, 1953, as an habitual offender. On February 13, 1987, at the defendant’s request, the department of safety (department) held a hearing at which the defendant requested that his license be restored.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StrattonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. State v. EbingerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HullSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. State v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Cook v. CIGNA InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API