Legal Opinion
State v. Hull
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 2003No. 2002-297PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Gregg Hull, appeals his convictions for driving under the influence of liquor (DUI), third offense, see RSA 265:82 (Supp. 2002); RSA 265:82-b, 11(b) (Supp. 2002), and felony reckless conduct, see RSA 631:8 (1996), following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Hicks, J.). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion in limine to exclude his prior Massachusetts conviction for operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI); (2) denying his motion to dismiss the charges for insufficient evidence; (3) denying his motion to set aside the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. KilukSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. RileyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. EricsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.