State v. Eason
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
In this appeal from his conviction for first degree murder, RSA 630:1-a, the defendant, Allen M. Eason, assigns error to the following findings and rulings of the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.): (1) that the State’s failure to preserve certain evidence for trial did not deny the defendant his right to due process of law as guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment of the National Constitution; (2) that the State presented sufficient evidence to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; (3) that certain opinion testimony of the State’s expert witness was admissible as within his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GrafSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. Carl GibsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- WPI V. MeritorDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999