Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Malone v. District Court of Sixth Judicial District

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1930No. 2883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent to assume jurisdiction in a contempt proceeding in which he had refused to proceed on the ground that he had no jurisdiction.

We do not deem it necessary to state the allegations of the petition in detail, as the only question involved is the interpretation of one section of our water law.

The state engineer, pursuant to proceedings theretofore had, filed with the clerk of the Sixth judicial district court in and for Humboldt County his order of determination of the relative rights of the water…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Ingles v. McMillanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Welter v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. McCarthy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Noble v. NobleNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Hinckley v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  3. United States v. Humboldt Lovelock Irr. Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe v. State Engineer of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Jahn v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API