Legal Opinion

South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe v. State Engineer of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2002No. 37094PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal concerns the scope of a district court’s power to enter orders of contempt, and the standard upon which we must review such orders. When the legislature has provided for a direct appeal of a district court’s contempt order, we will review for abuse of discretion. We hold that a district court’s contempt power does not encompass the power to order an Indian tribe to enact a legislative resolution. The district court may order that, if a con-temnor continues in its contempt, it must post a bond as security to cover costs incurred as a result of the contempt. Additionally, the…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ex Parte SlavinTexas Supreme Court · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rodriguez v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Las Vegas Police Protective Ass'n Metro, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Suthers v. Cash Advance & Preferred Cash LoansColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. DETWILER VS. DIST. CT. (BAKER BOYER NAT'L BANK)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API