South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe v. State Engineer of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal concerns the scope of a district court’s power to enter orders of contempt, and the standard upon which we must review such orders. When the legislature has provided for a direct appeal of a district court’s contempt order, we will review for abuse of discretion. We hold that a district court’s contempt power does not encompass the power to order an Indian tribe to enact a legislative resolution. The district court may order that, if a con-temnor continues in its contempt, it must post a bond as security to cover costs incurred as a result of the contempt. Additionally, the…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ex Parte SlavinTexas Supreme Court · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Rodriguez v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Las Vegas Police Protective Ass'n Metro, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Suthers v. Cash Advance & Preferred Cash LoansColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- DETWILER VS. DIST. CT. (BAKER BOYER NAT'L BANK)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.