Sorensen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
This case stems from the merger in 1968 of the Chicago Great Western Railway Company into the Chicago and North Western Railway Company. The defendant-appellee is the company that resulted from the merger; plaintiff-appellants are employees or former employees of the defendant who claim that they have been denied certain of the protections afforded them, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 5(2)(f), by the ICC orders approving the merger and a subsequent protective agreement entered into by their union and the defendant. The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to both of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. NemitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richard Nemitz v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- James C. Batts v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Austin P. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Arnold v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1960
- Sorensen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sorensen v. Chicago And North Western Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980