Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1980No. 79-1684PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case stems from the merger in 1968 of the Chicago Great Western Railway Company into the Chicago and North Western Railway Company. The defendant-appellee is the company that resulted from the merger; plaintiff-appellants are employees or former employees of the defendant who claim that they have been denied certain of the protections afforded them, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 5(2)(f), by the ICC orders approving the merger and a subsequent protective agreement entered into by their union and the defendant. The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to both of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. NemitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Richard Nemitz v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. James C. Batts v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Austin P. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. Arnold v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1960
  5. Sorensen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sorensen v. Chicago And North Western Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API