Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railroad v. Nemitz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1972No. 70-97PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

In connection with a 1964 consolidation by which petitioner railway company absorbed New York, Chicago & St. Louis R.,Co. (Nickel Plate), the so-called Sandusky Line, running from Columbus, Ohio, to Sandusky, Ohio, was acquired from the Pennsylvania Railroad system. Respondents were at the time employees of the Pennsylvania on the Sandusky Line. Their work was seasonal because the winter freeze barred navigation on Lake Erie. During those periods j unior employees of Sandusky *39worked at other points on the Pennsylvania’s Toledo Division.

In anticipation of the 1964 consolidation, petitioner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Joe Paper Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Richard Nemitz v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. Nemitz v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jackson Transit Authority v. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Worldcom, Inc. v. Graphnet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API