Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 19, 1960No. Civ. A. 2650, 2651, 2652PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. MILLER, District Judge.

These actions have been submitted upon plaintiffs’ amended complaints and defendants’ motions to dismiss. The motions present identical legal questions.

The facts, as disclosed by the amended complaints, the motions to dismiss, and the affidavits filed in support of the motions, are as follows:

Prior to August 14, 1957, plaintiffs; were employed by the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway and by the Loixisville and Nashville Railroad Compfipf'. On March 1, 1957, the Interstate Commerce Commission, in Finance Dock-18845, Louisville & • Nashville…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Bell v. Western Ry.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Van Patten v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, an Unincorporated Association v. Chicago and North Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Richard Nemitz v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. O'mara v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Friedman v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Clemens v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API