Legal Opinion
Ford v. Minneapolis Public Schools
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 21, 2014No. A13-1072PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a whistleblower claim on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations, appellant argues that the district court erred in determining that (1) the limitations period began to run on the date that appellant was notified that her job was being eliminated and (2) equitable estoppel did not apply to toll the statute of limitations. We affirm the summary judgment and deny respondent’s motion to strike.
FACTS
Appellant Yvette Ford began working for respondent Minneapolis Public School District’s English Language…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Golden Gate National Senior Care LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Yvette Ford v. Minneapolis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Yvette Ford v. Minneapolis Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014