Ex parte Green
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The return of the city marshal of the city of Pomona shows that he holds the petitioner in custody in the city jail of said city under and by virtue of a commitment issued out of the recorder’s court of said city, which recites that petitioner was convicted in said court of the crime of misdemeanor committed in said city, and upon such conviction said court ordered and adjudged that for said offense petitioner be imprisoned in the city jail of said city of Pomona for a period of ten days and fined $150, and that in default of the payment of said fine he be imprisoned in said city jail in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re GoetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. SayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Nourse v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.