Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Goetz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1941No. Crim. No. 468PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

46 Cal.App.2d 848 (1941)

In re RUDY GOETZ, on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 468.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist.

Sept. 25, 1941.

N. D. Meyer for Petitioner.

George F. Holden, District Attorney (Orange County), and Roland Thompson, City Attorney (Newport Beach), for Respondent.

MORTON, J., pro tem.

Petitioner was found guilty of anchoring a vessel in Newport Harbor, within the jurisdiction of the city of Newport Beach, at an anchorage, which had not been first approved by the harbor master of the city. On appeal to the Superior Court of Orange County the judgment was affirmed. Subsequently, an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. RingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. MendosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. In Re HerronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re Petition of MorckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. BlakemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. In Re MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API