State v. Deitrick
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Des Moines District Court. The defendant was indicted for seduction. He was found guilty and sentenced to hard labor in the penitentiary for the period of three years. He appeals to this court for a reversal of the judgment against him.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
l. seduction•. previous chastity: evidence. — I. Upon the cross-examination of Christina Myers, the prosecuting witness, the following interrogatories were propounded to her by defendant’s counsel: '
"I will ask you whether you ever had intercourse with any member of that variety troupe ?
“I will ask you if defendant is the only man you ever had intercourse with?”
Objections were made to these interrogatories, which were sustained by the court.
*468It is claimed that the court erred in excluding the answers to these interrogatories, and the case of the State v. Sutherland, 30 Iowa, 570, is cited as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. GroomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- State v. HusseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- State v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. . MaloneeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. WatermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Barker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.