Legal Opinion

State v. . Malonee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1910PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal by defendant from J. 8. Adams, J., at Spring Term, 1910, of JacKsoN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of Mr. Justice Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

"Walker, J.

Tbe defendant was indicted for tbe crime of seducing an innocent and virtuous woman under promise of marriage. (Revisal, sec. 3354.) Tbe statute provides tbat tbe unsupported testimony of the woman shall not be sufficient to convict. Tbe prosecutrix testified to tbe promise of marriage, tbe seduction, and ber innocence and virtue. A child was born to ber, and was eighteen months old at tbe time of tbe trial. There was evidence tending to show tbat prior to ber alleged seduction by tbe defendant she bad always been a woman of good character and led a blameless life, and tbat as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. People v. BrewerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. State v. . KinsaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API