Legal Opinion

Reed v. Harkrader

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1920No. 3347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was in the possession of a parcel of land in Juneau, Alaska, claiming to own the same through the will of George Harkrader, deceased. The defendant in error brought ejectment, claiming that she was the only child and sole heir of George Harkrader, and that the will was void as to her for its failure to mention her. It was conceded that under the law of Alaska, if a testator having a legitimate child devises his property by will without mention of the child, the will is, so far as she is concerned, void. The controversy in the court below concerned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Davis v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Holmes v. HolmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huard v. McTeighOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Edwards v. FrankeAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bolin v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Marris v. SockeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Parks v. ParksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API