Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Dowdy

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2005No. S-10946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

In this petition for review, we address whether an arbitrator should decide two disputed insurance coverage issues. This matter arises in the context of an insurance policy’s arbitration clause that provides for arbitration by written request of the insured or the insurer as to either of two questions: (1) “Is the insured legally entitled to collect damages from the owner or driver of the uninsured vehicle or under insured motor vehicle”; and (2) “if so, in what amount?”

Barbara and Asa Dowdy requested arbitration of their negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED)…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Harvey v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. DowdyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sidney v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. OK Lumber Co., Inc. v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. Nathan Harbour, Allstate Insurance Company v. Kenneth N. MattisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API