Ivler v. Stanton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The amended complaint alleges the existence of a driveway on the defendants’ land in Stamford over which the plaintiffs, abutting landowners, had by deed a reserved use in common with the defendants, for purposes of ingress and egress. Such use was to continue until there was erected on the defendants’ premises “a building or buildings of a permanent nature, ... so placed as to prevent the use of said driveway in which event the said reserved right shall terminate.” The amended complaint further alleged that the defendants “has [sic] commenced construction of a small addition to the existing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Katsoff v. LucertiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Ryan v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Mainolfi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zamstein v. MarvastiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Saphir v. NeustadtConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Palmieri v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
- Hartford v. Alexander, Joshua Asso., No. Cv92-0509468 S (Oct. 28, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Palmieri v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 1975