Legal Opinion

Katsoff v. Lucertini

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 9, 1954PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The plaintiffs sought an injunction to require the defendants to remove a sign on the roof of a building on the defendants’ land adjoining the plaintiffs’ premises on the south and to restrain them from erecting a sign or a building on their property. This appeal is taken from a judgment for the defendants denying the plaintiffs’ prayers for relief. The principal question is whether the court erred in concluding that the erection and use of the billboard does not constitute a violation of a restrictive covenant and that the billboard is not a “building” within the intendment of the covenant.

Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Andrew B. Hendryx Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Middlesex Theatre, Inc. v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. B. T. Harris Corporation v. BulovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Burton v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Pulver v. MascoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API