Legal Opinion

Palmieri v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 14, 1975No. FILE No. 65PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSponzo, J.

The plaintiff assigns as error the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer. In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that the defendant, zoning board of appeals, refused to hear his appeal from the ruling of the zoning enforcement officer, and the plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to conduct a hearing and render a decision. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law and that he also has no clear legal right to the performance of a ministerial act by the zoning enforcement officer. The lower court, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Ryan v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  3. Mainolfi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Ivler v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API