Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Ray MacKlin Earnestine Mack

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1990No. 89-5807PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing the signed confessions of the two defendants in this case, Albert Ray Macklin and Earnestine Mack. Both defendants were charged with forging the endorsement of the payee on a United States Treasury check, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(1). Both defendants are considered mildly retarded. The district court concluded that their disabilities incapacitated them from making truly voluntary statements, in the absence of their receiving and comprehending their Miranda rights. The court also held that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Matthew Livers v. Tim DunningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Aaron L. SalvoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. State v. BlackstockTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Anthony Roderick PhillipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Calvin B. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API