Legal Opinion

State v. Blackstock

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2000No. E1994-00004-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonChief Justice Anderson

The defendant, who has an IQ of 55 and functions on the level of an eight to nine-year old child, was convicted by a jury for the aggravated sexual battery of a seven-year-old female. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s findings that the defendant was competent to stand trial, that the defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his Miranda rights, that the trial court was without jurisdiction to order involuntary commitment and treatment as a mentally retarded offender, and that the defendant should not have been sentenced as an especially mitigated…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. PettusTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mooney v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Walker v. Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API