Buckner v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HILL, P. J.
In this product liability action, defendant appeals from an order granting a new trial on plaintiff’s claims of failure to warn of the dangers of the product. The order was entered on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, after the jury found in favor of defendant on its sophisticated user defense (Johnson v. American Standard, Inc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 56 [74 Cal.Rptr.3d 108, 179 P.3d 905] (Johnson)). The jury found plaintiff was a sophisticated user of the product who already had, or should have had, knowledge of the dangers of the product;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnson v. American Standard, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Finn v. G. D. Searle & Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Chavez v. Glock, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Uriell v. Regents of UCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Watts v. Pneumo AbexCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024