Legal Opinion
County of St. Charles, Missouri v. Missouri Family Health Council
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1997No. 96-3029PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action brought by the County of St. Charles, Missouri, to clarify its eligibility for funding under Title X, 42 U.S.C. § 300. The County sought a declaration in state court that the Missouri Family Health Council (Council) could not reject its application for funding on the basis of its parental consent policy. The Council removed the case to federal court and moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The district court 2 denied the County’s motion to remand after determining there was federal jurisdiction and then granted the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morton v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Biw Deceived v. Local S6, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Iamaw District Lodge 4Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Briehl v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Michael Todd v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas State Police Department, and David D. StillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- In re G.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Luke Schuver v. Midamerican Energy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.