Legal Opinion
Medtox Scientific, Inc. v. Morgan Capital L.L.C.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1999No. Civ. 97-253 ADM/AJBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Medtox Scientific, Inc. (“Med-tox”), fik/a Editek, Inc. (“Editek”), 1 filed this action on January 31, 1997, to recover alleged short-swing insider profits realized by Defendant Morgan Capital L.L.C. (“Morgan Capital”) and its alleged control persons, Defendants Alex and David Bis-tricer (“Bistricers”), on a series of 1996 transactions involving Editek stock. On August 4, 1997, Judge Richard H. Kyle of this Court dismissed Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foremost-McKeeson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Frey v. City of HerculaneumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Hamm v. GrooseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CIBC World Markets, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Medtox Scientific, Inc., Formerly Known as Editek, Inc. v. Morgan Capital, L.L.C., Alex Bistricer, David BistricerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Bistricer v. Singer, Bienenstock, Zamansky, Ogele & Selengut, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005