Legal Opinion

Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Rogers

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1936No. Nos. 2983, 3041PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

These two patent infringement suits charge contributory infringement by defendants of three patents, i. e,; Manzel patent, No. 1,459,662, issued June 19, 1923,' on application filed August 18, 1920; Zerk patent, No. 1,475,980, issued December 4, 1923, on application filed November 21, 1922; and Butler patent, No. 1,593,791, issued July 27, 1926, on application filed February 19, 1923.

These two cases were consolidated for trial, with the understanding that all the evidence taken would be available and apply to the issues in each suit.

Claim 1 of the Manzel patent is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Le VallyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
  4. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Jacques v. Universal Lubricating Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API