Legal Opinion

Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Rogers

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 9, 1939No. Nos. 6350, 6351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The appeals at bar are limited to a consideration of claims 2, 3 and 5 of United States Patent No. 1,475,980, issued on December 4, 1923 to Oscar Zerk for a lubricating apparatus. The appeals at bar are further limited by the charge made by Stewart-Warner Corporation, the appellant in each cause, that the appellees have been guilty of contributory infringement of Zerk’s patent by manufacturing and selling nipples or fittings of the kind described in the Zerk patent with the knowledge and intention that such nipples would be used with the appellant’s compressors having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. R. M. Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. RogersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas & Betts Co. v. Steel City Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Thomas & Betts Co. v. Steel City Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Consolidated Packaging Machinery Corp. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API