Legal Opinion

Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Le Vally

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 15, 1936No. 13955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as assignee and owner of patent No. 1,593,791 to Butler, applied for February 19, 1923, and allowed July 27, 1926, sues the Lincoln Engineering Company of Illinois for contributory infringement of claim 2. The defenses are invalidity and uoninfringement.

Claim 2 1 of the Butler patent describes a lubricating system for automobiles or other machines, essentially high pressure in character, in which each bearing is provided with a headed nipple for receiving oil or grease of a lubricant compressor having a coupling member for connecting said compressor with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  4. Lyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  3. Alemite Co. v. Jiffy Lubricator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Armstrong v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  5. Whatley v. Johnson-Rast & Hays, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API