Taylor v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
In this appeal we consider, among other things, the constitutionality of Delaware’s gang participation statute, 11 Del. C. § 616. Appellants argue that the statute is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term “actively participates.” In addition, they say that the statute is overbroad because it impinges on the right of free association. Both arguments lack merit. A person of ordinary intelligence can understand what it means to actively participate in a criminal street gang’s criminal conduct, and there is no constitutional right to assemble for the purpose…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- People v. CastenadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Poon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Montague v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.