Legal Opinion
United States v. Marvin Rubenstein, AKA Jacob Rubenstein, Isaac Rubenstein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 31, 2005No. Docket 03-1721PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge CARDAMONE concurs in the majority opinion and in a separate concurring opinion.
JACOBS, Circuit Judge.
Marvin Rubenstein and Isaac Ruben-stein (collectively “defendants”) appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Block, J.), convicting them after a jury trial of violating the work-practice standards for asbestos set out in the Clean Air Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 7412 et seq., 40 C.F.R. §§ 61.145, 61.150, and of conspiracy to do so. Defendants challenge their convictions on the ground that the district court’s instruction that the jury could…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. VillafuerteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. James RattoballiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Andrew FagansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.