Legal Opinion
State v. Tyler-Barcomb
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 3, 1985No. 11362; 11363PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
After a joint jury trial, the defendants Frederick Barcomb (hereinafter Barcomb) and Stephanie Tyler-Barcomb (hereinafter Tyler-Barcomb) were convicted of impairing the morals of a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21. Barcomb was also convicted of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1). TylerBarcomb received a total sentence of not less than two and one-half nor more than five years, and Barcomb received a total effective sentence of not less than five nor more than ten years.
On appeal the defendants claim that: (1) there was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.