Legal Opinion

United States v. Bradley

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 1, 1989No. ACM 27126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Staff Sergeant Bradley was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of larceny and housebreaking, violations of Articles 121 and 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 930. Before us, he raises two contentions:

I

THE APPELLANT WAS SUBJECTED TO SELECTIVE PROSECUTION IN VIOLATION OF HIS FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION.

II

THE EVIDENCE IS INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW TO PROVE THE APPELLANT GUILTY OF HOUSEBREAKING.

I

The appellant claims he was singled out for prosecution in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights. He was part of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Louis Martin Radetsky, A/K/A L. M. RadetskyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Willie Bell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Ronald JarrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Terrence Dean OaksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AlexanderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. BradleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. JacksonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. State v. KadderlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API