Legal Opinion

State v. Kadderly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 5, 2001No. 970746181; A101010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction of one count of prostitution, ORS 167.007, challenging the trial court’s denial of her motion to dismiss on vindictive and selective prosecution grounds. The sole issue presented is whether a prosecutor’s decision not to bring charges against persons who testify truthfully against other offenders, while charging those who invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege and decline to so cooperate, amounts to vindictive or selective prosecution as to the persons who are charged. We conclude that it does not and, consequently, we affirm.

The relevant facts are not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibson v. SchmidtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API