Legal Opinion

Fredy D. Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 28, 2014No. 13-10951PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILMAN, Circuit Judge:

This is a consumer-protection case arising from the unwanted receipt of autod-ialed debt-collection calls to a cell phone. It began when Clara Betancourt applied for a car-insurance policy with State Farm in 2007. At the conclusion of the car-insurance application process, the State Farm agent suggested that Betancourt open a State Farm credit-card account so that the policy premium could be charged to the credit card. During the application process, Betancourt gave State Farm the phone number 754-244-8626 (No. 8626). Betancourt contends that she gave this number only as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. John Daubert v. NRA Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. ACA Int'l v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Leyse v. Bank of America National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. Noreen Susinno v. Work Out World IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API