Legal Opinion

Cole v. Tobacco Institute

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 26, 1999No. 1:97-cv-00256PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs have brought suit against tobacco manufacturers for themselves and purportedly for all other persons in Texas who are similarly situated; i.e. cigarette smokers, past and present, or their survivors and next of kin.

One of the defendants, B.A.T. Industries p.l.c., has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction on the grounds that it is merely a holding company based in Great Britain without any connection to the cigarette industry in the United States, and therefore exempt from having personal jurisdiction exercised over it.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wright v. Sage Engineering, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  2. SITQ E.U., Inc. v. Reata Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. TravelJungle v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Simon v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  5. Luxury Travel Source v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API